Wall Street Strategies
Hello! Sign in or Register


Question of the Week

At one point gross domestic product (GDP) and oil demand moved in tandem but after the recession both readings have diverged. Do you think that GDP and Oil Consumption will move in tandem again and what does that mean for the American economy?
Post your answer below.

Morning Commentary

Bond Yields Dive

By Charles Payne, CEO & Principal Analyst
12/15/2014 6:38 AM

A week ago, powered by strong jobs numbers bond yields began to rally, but since then, it is back down and is gaining momentum.  Obviously, there is a knee-jerk move into bonds that has paid off for years; is there another message?  I am not sure, but I think its nuts for the average investor to hand over cash to the federal government in return for 2% or $2.00 for each $100 lent.  Nevertheless, this is big money at work and is presumably smart money.

I still do not think it’s about deflation, although free-falling crude does speak of the unknown.

That is the irony of last week, where the Dow suffered its worst loss since November 2011.  All the official news was good news.

Heck, some might even say it was great news.  Consumer sentiment surged, retail sales were better than expected and most earnings are still besting consensus.

Something's Amiss, Crude Reality

Going into the weekend, we had to take one last hard look at crude oil.  Yesterday, it broke under its last real support point at $60, and unless something drastic happens fast, several expert observers are saying crude could move back to the lows of 2009.  (It began trading last night at $57.50.)

As someone that looks to the past for guidance in the future, I continue to worry, not about cheap gas- what it says about the economy.

Each day, there is more evidence that things have simply changed.  The rule of thumb was that the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and oil consumption moved hand in hand.

Interestingly, just as we were officially coming out of the recession, the GDP began to rebound, but our consumption has fallen hard and it has not recovered.

So, is this a demand story and not a proxy for deflation around the corner?  Maybe this time it is different.

Moreover, I do see a snapback rally in crude oil, but I just can't put a finger on the bottom.

 Today’s Session

Early market indications have been positive so far, although nowhere near enough to make up for last week’s drop. Of course any relief from last week's drubbing is welcomed but there's no way we’ll take the bite at the first bounce. Maybe that mindset plays a role in failed rally attempts, but the bias has shifted to the downside and there are so many cheap stocks that are allowing the dust to settle. We believe that waiting, rather than buy into a temporary wind shift is the right thing to do.

There was some substantial contraction in the New York Fed district, as the Empire State Manufacturing Survey indicated this morning. The general business conditions index fell to a reading of -3.58 from 10.16 in November, and to the first negative reading since January of last year. The report showed relatively strong momentum between May and September when the index averaged about 21.2. New orders were negative but not the biggest laggard this month, coming in at a reading of -1.97 compared to November’s 9.14. This is the fourth time this year new orders dipped in the red.


Comments
only if domestic production equals domestic consumption and oil exporting does not gain traction

steve on 12/15/2014 10:54:13 AM
I cannot believe that the long term tie between strength of the economy and consumption of oil (or anything else) will break. I do believe that we are in a period of correction where the baseline is being reset.

We have 3 things occurring which run counter to the tie between GDP and oil consumption. First, this is a jobless recovery, as we move to more capitol than labor. We are also seeing a very small effect from the growth of cottage industry where their is less travel involved. So, the component of oil consumption tied to employment is much lower than would be expected under the former norm.

Second, we are still in the process of reducing oil consumption per mile driven. So, there is a downward pressure on consumption due to more efficiency of the cars. This will be aggravated through this recovery by the low interest rates which facilitate new car purchases.

Third, and I believe the largest impact is the shift occurring away from brick and mortar retail. Brick and mortar business cannot compete with onljne shopping because the playing field is not level. The online businesses can locate in states without income taxes, and then also pay no sales taxes. I now buy most non-perishables online, and I am shifting more purchases that way as the shift has also resulted in reduced selection at brick and mortar outlets. I foresee that it will not be long before this shift to onlne buying also encompasses perishables.

I do not feel that it is right (moral judgment here) for the federal government to sustain this bias for online sales. I also see that governments at all levels are concerned with the lost tax revenues. We have the technology to collect sales taxes based on both origin and destination locations, so I expect the government to fix this under the next president, probably by collecting 25% of the sale tax for the source location and 75% for the destination location, each at their own tax rate. (It is a consumer tax, not a producer tax). With that change, we should see a pause or stop in the shift to online buying and more tie between oil consumption and GDP.

Bob G on 12/15/2014 12:46:52 PM
I think Saudie Arabia is the major player to watch. They are trying to
manipulate the market and our Muslim Lover in the White House is going along.

Looking at Europe, I fear another
recession and this time we have no dollar reserves to fall back on.


tom wayne on 12/15/2014 2:14:14 PM
This country was built on cheap (inexpensive) energy. But times are different today with all the debt and cheap energy will not save us as the prospect of increased oil prices is like a sword hanging over us.

Rodman Johnson on 12/15/2014 2:38:27 PM
Next president. Although fine men, Romney and Bush, etc, are simply examples of republicans the common man doesn't relate to. We need a conservative from a "minority" group. I like Bobby Jindhal or Marco Rubio (maybe Charles Payne). They need to go out and explain to us commoners how the progressives are hurting us.

Wm Hutchinson on 12/15/2014 4:43:40 PM
Uber powers at war. We commoners will not get the entire story on who the players are who will influence the most. Don't think low prices will last beyond January. Too much at stake for the "influencers" to stay low for too long.

Barry Gold on 12/16/2014 1:57:03 PM
We have spent years driving smaller cars, switching to energy saving lamps, better insulated houses and discovering new ways to drill oil and gas. It's finally paying off. GDP should celebrate! We have the best catalyst for growth imaginable. Cheap energy!

frankdicostanzo@hotmail.com on 12/16/2014 2:44:31 PM
 

Log In To Add Your Comment


Home | Products & Services | Education | In The Media | Help | About Us |
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use |
All Rights Reserved.

 

×