Wall Street Strategies
Hello! Sign in or Register


Morning Commentary

Life and the Expectations Game

By Charles Payne, CEO & Principal Analyst
3/12/2014 9:40 AM

"And it was the din of all these hollow-sounding voices that made him halt irresolutely in the pursuit of phantoms. He gave them ear only for a time but he was happy only when he was far from them, beyond their call, alone or in the company of phantasmal comrades."

James Joyce:  A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man

In the game of life, those in the public eye of judgment have found it necessary to affect outcomes by establishing expectations. In that position, it doesn't take long to figure out that the success is not measured by actual results or output, but output versus expectations.  Some call it a game and those aren't even the cynics. Unfortunately, this game seems to work when it comes to things like measuring our elected leaders, and judging the stock market and economy.

So, we have to come to expect the worst example of sandbagging on economic goals and achievements from the people we elect. We buy broad promises that offer little detail and more recently it's been good enough to say hope and change would make life better.

How does one measure hope and change? How does the public penalize the politician that comes up short of an unspecified goal or promise?

GDP First 5 Years

Reagan

Obama

Year 1

+2.6

-2.8

Year 2

-1.9

+2.5

Year 3

+4.6

+1.8

Year 4

+7.3

+2.8

Year 5

+4.3

+1.9

Average

+3.4

+1.2

In many cases, politicians get away with coming up short. The stock market is a little more discerning with respect to retribution when it comes to failure to achieve stated goals. This is why management offers watered-down expectations, and then analysts water them down even further, so the official consensus is typically well below actual potential and true markers of success. Of course there are exceptions to Wall Street expectations, including the superstar CEO and company that seems to always come up short, but still enjoys a strong stock price.

For those companies that do miss watered-down expectations, there has been massive hell to pay.

No Love for Don Juan

Channel surfing the radio on my way home last night, I heard a newsreader say: "and he didn't even use the "L" word." He was referring to Juan Pablo, the star of the 18th season of the 'Bachelor' who came in with huge expectations. The single father, former soccer player and Latin lover ready to warm the hearts of American women, hyped more than any other lead in the show's history. Turns out this dude was a dud. As the show progressed, complaints mounted and led to a new consensus that he was the "worst ever."

Homophobic
Narcissist
Mean

The guy didn't propose at the end of the show, and never uttered the word 'love' despite picking his mate in the finale that saw its ratings down 9% from the year-ago period.

No Longer Swooning

President Obama can relate to Juan Pablo this morning. In the latest Wall Street Journal survey, his approval rating has plummeted to an all-time low of 41% while his disapproval is now at 54%. I'm not surprised with current poll numbers as it was clear the large crowds were getting smaller, and fewer people were swooning in the wake of the president's presence. I think the most alarming part of this survey was the negative rating of 38% among Democrats versus a 35% positive.

ACA

49% think Obamacare is a bad idea
35% think Obamacare is a good idea

Last night, a republican won a special election in a district President Obama carried both times and against an opponent that outspent him 3 to 1. David Jolly won the seat running solely against the new healthcare law.

The Market

Stocks have benefited from several factors, including low expectations. Those expectations remain low but are now unclear. Will the economy grow 3.0% or more this year, and if it's a lot less, can we continue to make excuses? I'm not sure, but there is no doubt when it comes to the expectations game it still favors the market and investors.


Comments
Who is this Juan man. Who has time for that fiction?

Andrew Juan Carney on 3/12/2014 10:50:20 AM
One of my disappointments has been hoping that the Republicans would finally find a backbone (aka Ted Cruz from Texas). I can only hope the voters will reveal theirs in the coming elections!

John Stovall on 3/12/2014 11:15:52 AM
FBN changed the start time for the Varney show, delaying the start of my whole day.

z on 3/12/2014 11:32:02 AM
This is a comment, not an answer to the your question.

The term "useful idiots" applies to a large portions of today's population.

Larry Kusche on 3/12/2014 12:34:37 PM
Did you see CBS this morning allow (Obamas Brain) Valerie Jarrett blame Bush's policies for the CIA spying on Feinstein's committee? This administration does not believe that "Producers are rewarded at the expense of non-producers". They are narcissistic and a bunch of excuse makers. In summary, "Opinions fade away, achievement endures. Excuses die, the record stands". You're the man Charles, you have been spot on and have helped the public make great investment choices.


Bill Calkins on 3/12/2014 1:08:14 PM
I used to have moderate expectations in the Republican leadership in the hopes that they would lead the country to a more conservative social and fiscal future. Since the 2010 elections (GOP control of the House) I have witnessed the abysmal failures of the alleged GOP House leadership with every major and minor confrontation with the Administration and/or House & Senate Democrats. I have zero confidence in the GOP regarding the fiscal, social or national best interest of the U.S.

Rick Blackford on 3/12/2014 1:35:45 PM
I would like to buy a new vehicle, but I have been spoiled with having no vehicle payments.

Bob Medkeff on 3/12/2014 1:41:59 PM
The expectation that really fell short was that reasonable bi-partisanship based on the national welfare would prevail. I am not sure who to blame most because both parties have played the game in their end zones and not on the field. However, President Obama was elected and reelected by meaningful majorities which calls for cooperation, if not support, by the minority opposition. This has not occurred. For example, it is clear that the ACA is the law of the land and will prevail in the future. Based on that certainty, why haven't the Rs worked to improve it rather than continue to blather about repealing it. Why do they foam at the mouth at every attempt of cooperation, eg, Christy, Bennett, Crist? It is time to grow up and recognize the need to work together.

Harold Sader on 3/12/2014 2:17:13 PM
the gop's top priority to my way of thinking is voter I.D.... the irregularities in va, pa, fla, and ohio that could have changed the outcome of the last election must be corrected before anything else

paul meyerhoff on 3/12/2014 3:01:57 PM
There's such a competence drought that I haven't had any great expectations which could shatter.

Patricia Flynn on 3/12/2014 3:03:06 PM

Expectations that there would be a certain travel stop (Buc-ee's)in Texas opening up closer. And, expectations that democrats would NOT boycott that certain travel stop (Buc-ee's) just for the fact that they (Buc-ee's) is endorsing a "Republican" candidate for a state wide election.

How do I react to the disappointment? I don't know, but the next time I take a driving trip, I will certainly stop at that certain store, if only to buy a cup of coffee . . . and a large cup of ice . . . it's better than Sonic's ice.

*rant off*

It's become more difficult to have high expectations these days. Schools today do not hold kids' behaviors and activities up to high expectations, therefore it will not get any better unless we go back to allowing God back in our schools to help reestablish a moral standard.


P.S.
Who's Juan Pablo?



Pam on 3/13/2014 2:33:37 PM
 

Log In To Add Your Comment


Home | Products & Services | Education | In The Media | Help | About Us |
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use |
All Rights Reserved.

 

×